Microblogs 1.21

Since the main place for offtopes is a little peaceful, I decided to slightly change the format.

Here you can post any things that will be embarrassed in your head or seem interesting. One comment (and a branch under it) – one post. You can consider this, something like a tape of blogs, or a kind of Blogovskiyan Twitter.

There are no restrictions on topics, form or content, with the exception of compliance with the basic rules of the site and the lack of too negative stuffing – I will rub them.

To find this topic in a new design, open the “Search” tab in the header and drive “Microblogs” + Current month/year.

To simplify the navigation on the section, there will also be a set of useful links and a little reference information.

Read everything written is not necessarily, you can immediately scroll at the end of the page, or go into the desired branch.

Useful information

“Living” topics

SG-Live and Blogstems

Other SG communities

Blogs of the editorial office

The theme of the retrorescent, in which you can see the current list of games from donate voting on streams.

Useful pages

How to format comments in this topic

Buttons for formatting are cut off during the redesign, like HTML Tags. Instead, now you can use BB codes, as in old forums. The main tags (b, i, u, s) differ from HTML only square brackets [] instead of corners <>.

To insert the string separator (BR), instead of the new paragraph (p), you can use the combination of the SHIFT + Enter keys. Moreover, this formatting works more stable than breaking into paragraphs.

Insert pictures or videos into spoilers noidverificationcasinos.co.uk/ is no longer 🙁

How to create a branch of comments

Write a comment containing:

– Description for whom and what is it for.
– Additional branch rules if they are needed.

Then yourself Write the first comment in this branch: the first positive in a branch of positive, the first question is in the VEF branch ITD.

After that, if at least a couple of people join the branch, it will be fixed above.

Some basic tips for writing blogs

Relating the draft before the publication – Due to the basic shortcomings of the site, the date of the publication is indicated as the date of the blog, but the date of creation. This means that if you created a blog of the 10th, and then wrote in the same draft for 2 weeks, then after publication it will be somewhere on a 4-5 page of blogs where no one will see it. To avoid this, before the publication, transfer all the achievements to a new draft and leave PEr TOomment (at least automatic).

Indicate the sources – You can proceed from the best motives, fear of non -novice, ignorance, or just a desire to get a light mowing, but plagiarism is unlikely to remain unnoticed. Even if you quote only a specific statement – add a link. This will allow you to check the source and add extra couple of legitimacy points to your blog.

How to include a dark topic

You put the dark reader extension and no longer force memes with DTF.

If you have something to add here – write in the comments.

The best comments

And that was the problem. Because these overstated requirements have introduced to the fact that the newcomer received a list of what he must do, and in response, he received no-ha-ra. He looked at all this, understood that he was a finished asshole, moron and a fool that he decided to publish his horseradish without high -quality design on the great blogs of SG and left here. Because there was no positive connection in the brain from publication on the blogs of SG.

As a result, a vote will be shut up. And all the comments under it

And where is the option -“You are a hinting agent, your blog shit and your mother even agreed with this when I fucked her last night?”

Man, even a porno both flew from you. Come on five

Anonymous went into the cave … and burned down

I thought here: what if you conduct a poll vile “For what reasons you are minus blogs?”
Then, based on the results of the survey, choose the most common reasons and make a list of them that the authors could use.
Suppose the author publishes a blog, and leaves the notes in the comments:
“I didn’t like the grammar? Put a minus on this comment.”
“I did not like the design? Put a minus on this comment.”
“There is little Bukaf? Put a minus on this comment.”
“Dubai on the topic? Put a minus on this comment.”

This will not cancel this silent minus, but suddenly minusers will put the minuses under the right comments and the authors will be clearer, which is not so with their blogs.

Before you is not even a beta version of the redesign, this is a real alpha version.

I am still fucked up from this.

Who kills the past moderator becomes a new moderator. What do you think, the hair dryer in Biysk eager?

Yes, hesitated honestly. For years they sought feedback, wrote posts on blogs hear us, talk to us, and in response you get the maximum – go to streams and to the authors. As a result, the audience all fell out of here, and when there was nothing left and none left on this ashes, they decided to establish feedback. Timely and on time.

Lovegrudb blog finally got out of the pit.

I took some more time over the last question and came to what conclusions ..

With activity, trouble, but turn the SG into an DFF and drag everything on it “if only it was” – no need. And the bar of quality is also not necessary.

The problem of SG is in, his mother, “Ilitarity”. At the DF-Ah, also often arise for various occasions, but there you can always fight off something in the spirit of “Fool itself” or “Well, you are blinking”. This will not work here – you will be just crushed by arguments and make you feel an idiot. Because people are actually equally intolerant of each other, that here what is there.

Because of this, the authors begin to avoid controversial topics as much as possible and blogs become “dry”, an uninteresting arrangement of public, obvious (if you follow the author’s thoughts) or too subjective facts.

It seems to me that it is worth raising some ambiguous questions more often. But not for the sake of meaningless srach, but for the sake of a focused discussion. Without mats, personal transitions and with respect to all participants. More tolerant of someone else’s point of view (and errors). Structurally talk in vobish. Like right now, in this branch, for example (with some reservations, but it seems to me pretty good).

Added a link to the list of authors (I had to cram in the “editorial blogs”). #Thank youZDD

By the way, what do you think: it is worth adding links to pieces that are not directly related to the current Stopheim? Degrades, mental podcast, 16 on 9, personal twich-channels of the authors of the ITP (etc.).

Meanwhile, the blogs vegetate, another suitable topic. In my opinion, it is made pretty well and interesting, although it would be worth better to highlight key points.

The case when you must share the video

News/reviews/articles – generally another song, even there is another audience there is another.

I do not want to slander the person unfamiliar to me, but (see. attached file). He ran through his comments – 70 percent consist of a dry statement of what is lacking in someone else’s blogs, sometimes growing into busting on the topic “Well, I wanted the best, but you are in response, sir”. Moreover, as I understand it, in form they mirror comments on its own materials (chameleon?). The comment is taken from here.

P.S.: Ah, yes. He also began to spite to minute that he complained about silent minuses. The easiest way to staggering those who love to do it quietly.

So conceived. We can say that this is something like a local meme)

News

microblogs-1-21-1